The Value of Military Experience for Politicians: A Closer Look

Should someone interested in a career in politics have military experience? This is a complex question that has sparked much debate among political analysts and public figures. Historically, serving in the military has often been seen as a valuable asset for individuals seeking political office, particularly the highest office in the land - the presidency. However, the utility of such experience is multifaceted and requires careful consideration.

Historical Context and Personal Opinions

My personal opinion has always been that while it would be lovely to require a president to have served in the military, such a requirement would never be a definitive factor in determining their political status. It is ultimately the individual's ability to govern, lead, and make informed decisions that truly matter.

According to historical data, not all politicians with military experience were good politicians, just as not all without such experience were bad. From Franklin D. Roosevelt, our longest-serving president, to Donald Trump, who attended military school, the pattern of military service paired with political success or failure is inconsistent. We will never truly know what kind of politicians would have emerged if, for example, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump had served in the military.

Essential Military Experience for the Presidency

While every person who runs for office does not necessarily have to serve in the military, I believe that those aspiring to become the President of the United States must have active-duty military experience. Serving as the Commander-in-Chief comes with an understanding of the Department of Defense's (DoD) internal workings, the burdens and rewards of military leadership, and the gravity of decisions that involve military operations. This experience can foster a more cautious and thoughtful approach to foreign policy and defense matters.

Veterans in Politics: Not Always the Ideal Candidate

It is important to recognize that just because someone is a veteran does not automatically mean they will have good policies. Similarly, military service does not ensure one’s character is commendable. Many veterans, having served with honor, have entered politics not because they used their military experience as a means to gain political power, but rather to continue serving and contributing to society.

For instance, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump all have different paths they took. While some may have used their service to gain political clout, it is crucial to evaluate whether their service truly contributed to their integrity and their understanding of governing.

Valuing Service, Not Flouting It

America's military and political spheres have a long-standing relationship, and military service undoubtedly offers unique insights and perspectives that can be beneficial for a politician. However, the key is not to simply flaunt this service but to use it as a foundation for developing integrity and a genuine commitment to serving the public interest.

As Douglass Macbeth's analysis suggests, true leaders should not overplay their military cards but rather use this experience to foster a broader understanding of leadership and governance. This was exemplified by George Washington, the first president of the United States. Despite his unparalleled impact on American history, Washington did not boast about his achievements but rather let others speak on his behalf. He was a great leader who embraced the service of his country, whether in war or politics, driven by the pressure to serve rather than a personal agenda for power.

Ron Chernow’s book, 'Washington: A Life,' provides profound insights into the complexities of George Washington’s personality, achievements, and leadership style. The book highlights Washington's humility and his approach to being celebrated by others, which is a lesson worth emulating for modern political figures.

For those considering a career in politics and hoping to leverage a military background, it is essential to demonstrate humility, integrity, and a genuine commitment to public service. Simply wearing the badge of military service should not be equated with political success—it should be used as a tool to build a foundation of respect and competence.

Conclusion

While military experience can be a significant asset for a politician, it is not the sole determinant of their success. The ability to govern, make informed decisions, and lead with integrity are the true hallmarks of a capable political leader. As the relationship between the military and politics continues to evolve, it is crucial that those aspiring to public office recognize the value of service while avoiding the pitfalls of self-promotion.

Ultimately, the path to political success lies in a combination of military wisdom, integrity, and a genuine dedication to the public good.